Added to demo agenda!
Talk to our team to learn how Cassidy can help your team with this use case

AI Estimate Validation Agent

Historical estimate validation tool for mechanical subcontractor estimating—benchmark rates, flag outliers, and automate QA
Overview
Custom solution
Workflow

Automating Historical Estimate Validation with AI

Automate your entire estimate validation workflow—from data aggregation and benchmark comparison to outlier detection and scope QA—so every mechanical bid goes out accurate and defensible.
001

The agent compares current unit rates (MH/LF, $/LB, cost per fixture) against historical job-cost actuals and industry references like MCAA WebLEM labor units, stratified by material, size, join method, and site conditions.

002
Flag Outliers Before They Become Problems

Statistical analysis identifies lines that fall outside control limits—whether a copper piping rate that's 40% above P75 or duct labor that doesn't account for elevation factors—and surfaces them with context for rapid review.

003
Catch Scope Gaps Automatically

Automated QA checklists verify that commonly missed items—hangers, seismic bracing, sleeves, hydrostatic testing, TAB, and commissioning—appear with reasonable quantities, reducing the risk of costly omissions at buyout.

How Cassidy automates estimate validation using AI

Step 1: Ingest estimate and cost history

The Workflow triggers when a new estimate is uploaded or synced from your estimating platform (Trimble, QuoteSoft, FastEST). Cassidy pulls the estimate data alongside historical job-cost actuals from your ERP, normalizing everything to a unified cost-code structure.

Step 2: Normalize and enrich line items

Cassidy maps each line to your WBS and CSI MasterFormat codes, standardizes units (LF, LB, EA), and tags attributes like system type, material, size, join method, prefab vs. field, and install conditions.

Step 3: Build and apply benchmarks

The Agent computes unit rates from your current estimate and compares them against historical P25/P50/P75 bands, MCAA WebLEM labor units, and RSMeans references—adjusting for project type, location factors, and site-specific conditions.

Step 4: Detect outliers and variances

Using statistical thresholds and peer-group matching, Cassidy flags lines where MH/unit or $/unit falls outside expected ranges, providing variance magnitude and comparable historical data for each flagged item.

Step 5: Run scope completeness checks

Automated QA rules verify that standard mechanical scope elements are present—valves per LF, hangers proportional to pipe runs, seismic bracing, testing allowances, rigging, and commissioning—and flags likely omissions.

Step 6: Generate validation report

Cassidy compiles a validation package with flagged outliers, suggested adjustments, scope gap findings, and a risk register. The report routes to estimators for review, with approval workflows that log decisions and update the estimate via API.

Implement it inside your company

Get help from our team of specialists to quickly integrate this solution into your existing workflow and unlock new growth.
Book Demo
  • Hands-on onboarding and support
  • Self-paced training for your team
  • Dedicated implementation experts
  • Ongoing use case discovery
  • ROI tracking & analytics dashboards
  • Proven playbooks to get started fast

A dedicated team to drive adoption and results

Our implementation experts work hands-on with your team to make sure you see real value - fast. From setup to optimization, we’re here to help every step of the way.

We enable your teams - no IT required

We train your builders, support their workflows, and make sure they get the most out of Cassidy without ever waiting on engineering.

Explore more automations

Move from idea to production with Cassidy